CorrectMyText    Pengguna

 en ru de it fr es pt id uk tr

Inggris bahasa

Koreksi teks dari pengguna amelie.r

The idea of progress can be defined as an a developmen­t - a technical, scientific or social advance. To illustrate this notion, we studied the beliefs of “Self made man, which is deeply rotten in the American culture and European seen of this continent. We may wonder to what extent does the Self-man man conveys an idea of progress? First, we’ll talk about the work ethic required to get higher, and then, contribute to technical progress. Finally, we may wonder the ambigus impact of the self made man beliefs on American social advance / social values.
"Europa's rotten and stinking. In America, a fellow can get ahead. Birth don't matter, education don't matter. It's all getting ahead. " Manhattan Transfer, Dos Passos
I.
Steve Jobs is the perfect example of the American work ethic. He was a college dropout and at a young age, nothing about this man’s life shouted success. Jobs’s first company was born out of his own garage. His company is the world famous Apple Inc. His first great invention was that of the Macintosh computer. The future looked very bright but however, he was forced to leave Apple. For most people, this would have been devastatin­g and many would have never recovered. But his determinat­ion refused to be put out and he never quit. He immediatel­y founded a new company by the name of NeXT. Back to Apple, he created the famous iPhone. He has shown us that the is still alive, that through hard work and creativity, anything is possible.
II. Henry Ford is an industrial­ist who became a pioneer of mass production –he is here present by the writer Dos Passos in his book “The Big money”. He produced cars on a large scale and hired unskilled workers to work on the assembly line. He managed to standardiz­e his output to enhance efficiency in his plants. He created a famous car, the Model T, which sold millions. He was the first car manufactur­er to produce and sell millions of low-priced cars, so that many families, even among Ford’s workers, were affordable to buy a Ford T. Ford T is a symbol of “American way of life”: we see here that self made man as Ford contribute to a progress for the whole society, which benefits have betters living conditions and facilitate human’s activities.
III. But what is the real price of these progresses? Let us go to the second part of the text. It said that Ford imposed tough work rhythms on his employees and made a huge profit by luring them with higher wages, which they could only attain by long working hours.. He hints that Ford was able to make a profit because the workers were “sweated” and had tough working conditions. He exposes the drawbacks of mass production and assembly lines, where blue-collar workers were given tedious and repetitive jobs. He also makes a comment on their wages, since they were promised five dollars a day, but “of course it turned out that there were strings to it, ” or to put it differentl­y, they had to increase their efficiency and work long hours so that the output would be greater. Workers were also keeping under surveillan­ce, almost in a totalitari­an way. For Dos Passos, Ford’s workers can be seen as exploited and so, what we considered before as a society progress could be also seen as a social decline. Moreover, if only those who reach are recognized by society, it means that poors are just considered as people who “failed” because they didn’t work enough, that their situations is the complete result of their own fault. This capitalist-liberal point of view legalizes social inequaliti­es.
Another consequenc­e of the self made man myth is the glorificat­ion of wealth because the social achievemen­t is only reflected by money you have to flaunt. A famous expression in American language is to “make money”. Fitzgerald had dealt with this theme in his novel the Great Gatsby. This extract describe a party done by the principal character, Gatsby, a wealthy man in the 20’s which have make his fortune by blurred means, notably thanks to bootlegger activities. He can be considered as a self made man because he always reached to recover his money even after having lost everything. His party shows the shallownes­s of his guests, who acting as in a theater play. They aren’t interestin­g in each other, and they are only interestin­g in Gatsby about his fortune and the way he made fortune. The rest of the novel is even more critic about this materialis­t society, because Gatsby who had for him the money and social achievemen­t isn’t happy. He can’t buy the true value of life, love.
Self-made men climbed up the rungs of the social ladder and moved from rags to riches. thanks to their hard work. They are admired for stimulatin­g economic vitality; to offer innovation to society. But the other side of the coin reveals us that the American work ethics also meant to turn a blind eye on poverty and rough working condition of those who “failed”. In a nutshell, if self-made men can be synonym of personal progress and that their achievemen­ts contribute to technical progress it is not a guarantee of global social advance. Moreover, the glorificat­ion of money can make our life appears more superficia­l, which even call into question the benefit of success on our self-fulfilment.
bahasa: Inggris   Pengetahuan bahasa: Penutur asli, Kecakapan, Maju


Benar. PATRICIA01

The idea of progress can be defined as a developmen­t - a technical, scientific or social advance. To illustrate this notion, we studied the beliefs in the “self made man", which is deeply rooted in the American culture and in Europe seen from this continent. We may wonder to what extent does the self-made man convey an idea of progress? First, we’ll talk about the ethical process required to get higher (higher? ), and then, contribute to technical progress. Finally, we may question the ambiguous impact of the belief in the self made man on American social advance / social values.
"Europa's rotten and stinking. In America, a fellow can get ahead. Birth don't matter, education don't matter. It's all getting ahead. " Manhattan Transfer, Dos Passos
I.
Steve Jobs is the perfect example of the American work ethic. He was a college dropout and at a young age, nothing about this man’s life made success evident. Jobs’s first company was born out of his own garage. His company is the world famous Apple Inc. His first great invention was that of the Macintosh computer. The future looked very bright however, he was forced to leave Apple. For most people, this would have been devastatin­g and many would have never recovered. But his determinat­ion was never extinguish­ed and he never quit. He immediatel­y founded a new company by the name of NEXT. Back to Apple, he created the famous iPhone. He has shown us that the is still alive, that through hard work and creativity, anything is possible.
II. Henry Ford is an industrial­ist who became a pioneer of mass production –he is sketched by Dos Passos in his book “The Big money”. He produced cars on a large scale and hired unskilled workers to work on the assembly line. He managed to standardiz­e his output to enhance efficiency in his plants. He created a famous car, the Model T, which sold millions. He was the first car manufactur­er to produce and sell millions of low-priced cars, so that many families, even among Ford’s workers, could afford a Ford T. Ford T is a symbol of the “American way of life”: we see here that Ford as a self made man contribute­d to the progress of the whole society. People benefited of better living conditions human activities were facilitate­d.
III. But what is the real price of such a progress? Let's have a close look at the second part of the text. It says that Ford imposed tough work rhythms on his employees and made huge profits by luring them with higher wages, which they could only attain by long working hours... It suggests that Ford was able to make profits because the workers were “sweating” and underwent tough working conditions. The author exposes the drawbacks of mass production and assembly lines, where blue-collar workers were given tedious and repetitive jobs. He also makes a comment on their wages, since they were promised five dollars a day, but “of course it turned out that there were strings to it, ” or to put it differentl­y, they had to increase their efficiency and work long hours so that the output would be greater. Workers were also kept under surveillan­ce, almost in a totalitari­an way. For Dos Passos, Ford’s workers can be seen as exploited and consequent­ly, what was previously considered as a progress for society could be also seen as a social decline. Moreover, if only those who manage to climb the social ladder are valued by society, it means that poors are just regarded as the ones who “failed” because they didn’t work enough and are totally responsibl­e for this situation. This capitalist-liberal point of view legalizes social inequaliti­es.
Another consequenc­e of the self made man myth is the glorificat­ion of wealth because social achievemen­t is only reflected by the money you flaunt. A famous expression in American language is to “make money”. Fitzgerald dealt with this theme in his novel, The Great Gatsby. This extract describes a party thrown by the main character, Gatsby, a wealthy man in the 20’s who has made his fortune in an unsavoury way from bootleggin­g activities. He can be considered as a self made man because he always manages to recover his money even after having lost everything. His party shows the shallownes­s of his guests, who act as in a play. They aren’t interested in each other, and they are only fascinated by Gatsby's fortune and the way he made it. The rest of the novel is even more critical about this materialis­tic society, because Gatsby who had for him money and social achievemen­t isn’t happy. He can’t buy the true value of life, love.
Self-made men climbed up the rungs of the social ladder and moved from rags to riches thanks to their hard work. They are admired for stimulatin­g economic vitality and offering innovation to society. But the other side of the coin reveals us that the American work ethics also means to turn a blind eye on poverty and rough working conditions of those who “failed”. In a nutshell, if self-made men can be synonyms of personal progress and if their achievemen­ts contribute to technical progress, it is not a proof of social advance. Moreover, the glorificat­ion of money can make our lives look more superficia­l, and even call into question the benefit of success on an individual's self-fulfilment.

Silakan perbaiki teks ke Inggris:


Tolong bantu terjemahan:

English-Russian
English-Thai
English-Georgian
English-Latin